Clouding the Issue
This coming year is perhaps the most crucial in the relatively young life of the Canadian Trucking Alliance, the industry’s lobby group in Ottawa. A federal transportation blueprint to be released shortly is expected to place a great deal of emphasis on intermodal in future policies and planning. The railways are out lobbying the cause — trucks and rail working together, is how they frame it — explaining that a shift of freight from truck to rail would be better for the environment and reduce congestion on the highways.
What the railways ultimately want is a bigger piece of the pie when funds are divvied up for infrastructure. “Are you ministers of transportation, or highways?” Canadian Pacific Railway president and CEO Rob Ritchie asked provincial transport ministers at a meeting in Vancouver last month. “As matters stand today, it is my distinct impression that public roads and highways are your primary focus.” Ritchie, incidentally, wants half of $300 million earmarked for border improvements at Windsor, Ont., to help pay for a new rail tunnel under the Detroit River.
The fact is the railways have a limited window of opportunity to affect the long-term priorities for highway and transportation spending. It’s uncertain that David Collenette — whose advocacy of rail is unabashed — will keep his transport portfolio after the next federal leadership change, perhaps 18 months away. While they have a friend in office, Ritchie, Canadian National chief executive Paul Tellier, and the Railway Association of Canada will be pushing hard for changes to fuel and property tax policies — they want the taxes they pay to be invested in new rail projects.
While the railway lobby has cycled out promises of cleaner air and clearer highways before, this time is different. The Kyoto Protocol, which Prime Minister Jean Chrétien wants the federal government to ratify by the end of the year, gives a new framework to assertions that trucking is some sort of environmental thug — a charge that’s tough to swallow when you consider the industry’s progress on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The challenge for the Canadian Trucking Alliance will be to defend the industry’s record on the environment while at the same time directing policymakers to the real competitive issue surrounding Kyoto: that all freight modes in Canada will be at a disadvantage to commercial carriers from the United States, a country that has no plans to embrace Kyoto.
Unfortunately, as long as the railways continue to stoke up old he-said/she-said squabbling here at home, the need for parity with U.S. freight carriers on taxation and other policies that tip the competitive balance toward the south will not get the attention they deserve.
* * *
This time of year our busy little editorial crew gets hit with phone calls and e-mail looking for meaningful statistics about the trucking industry. The definition of “meaningful,” of course, is up to you. Last month, an espresso-charged market analyst from a bank asked me how many air-brake-equipped medium-duty trucks were registered in Alberta and Saskatchewan between 1997 and 2001. Banks, you might know, are big on numbers. We, however, are short on time and goodwill when it comes to such requests. I politely directed her elsewhere.
Truck operators in Canada are poorly quantified and loosely defined. Most trucking companies are privately held and small, and questions about the trucks they buy and the rates they charge and the wages they pay bring perfunctory replies: “Mind your own business.” Or something to that effect.
For your own good, I’m asking you to reconsider. There are two worthwhile research projects going on right now. One is a study of the nation’s truck drivers. Led by the Canadian Trucking Human Resources Council, the study is examining driver supply, turnover, and employment conditions, in part to find out why licensed drivers are choosing not to drive. The group is looking for input: contact the CTHRC at www.cthrc.com, 613/244-4800, or phone project manager Ray Barton at 613/837-0206.
The second study is one we’ve reported on before. It’s Cerno Research’s annual survey of how trucking companies compensate their employees and owner-operators — everything from per-mile pay rates to how many days off allowed after a death in the family. Download a survey form at www.cernoresearch.com, or call 1-877/282-3766, ext. 225, or 416/204-7866 (in Toronto).
It’s an extraordinarily tight labour market. Knowing why people leave — or better yet, what makes them stay — is a competitive advantage. When a business is understaffed, service quality is the first casualty. If you can’t distinguish yourself on service, all you’ve got left is your rate. And someone else always has a better rate.
If you’re resolving to be a better manager next year, start by contributing meaningful insight about how you manage your people. The results will be available next year. You’ll do yourself — and our beleaguered staff — a favour.
Have a safe holiday season and a prosperous new year. s
Have your say
This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.