Observations from the Salesman at Your Door
A while back I was visited by a tactfully persistent and completely likeable guy named Roman Kulesza, who operates a consulting business from his home in King City, Ont. He was downstairs in the lobby with a product he wanted to introduce me to, a device that uses magnetic technology (magnetohydrodynamics, or MHD, I was told) to control mineral scale buildup in tubes, pipes, and hoses that carry fluid.
These magnets — made by a company called ENECON in New York City — are primarily used in industrial settings as a descaler for water, Roman said. But on a diesel engine, the magnets deliver a positive charge to the hydrocarbon fuel molecules. The result, he claimed, is a more complete burn, the byproducts of which are better fuel economy and reduced emissions.
Now, about twice a year someone shows up at our doorstep with a pouch of aluminum pellets or a magic elixir to help your diesel engine do more work on less fuel. Such hopeful souls lay out a passel of mostly unverifiable testimonials and field trial results from some far-flung place like South Africa or Brazil, if they get upstairs at all.
I told Roman I wasn’t really interested in his $300 magnets, although they seemed harmless enough: at least you’re just clamping the device to your fuel line and not drilling any holes. What I wanted to know from Roman was how the truck and city taxi fleets he sees react when he knocks on their door. I wanted to hear how he handles the chilly receptions to his cold calls.
“It’s odd,” he began. “Some people have seen lots of smoke and mirrors over the years and lump me in with the rest of them. Magnetic technologies have been around for a long time, but they haven’t been strong enough to make a difference. I try to educate people. I’m up-front about the limitations of the product: the effectiveness depends a lot on fluid velocity. And it actually works better on older engines.”
When a door gets slammed shut, Roman persists.
“It’s not hard to find people who seem interested in saving fuel and reducing emissions,” he said. “They listen to what I have to say, they seem to understand, and then at the end they ask one question: Who else is using it? It’s as though they figure that as long as their competition is absorbing the same fuel costs as they are, they’re content. It’s a strange attitude, considering the margins they work with.”
Some prospects want to try before they buy.
“They say, ‘Let me tell you whether it works.’ That’s great. That’s a positive step to me,” Roman explained. “I ask them to show me their current fuel records so we can outline some benchmarks. And the conversation stops. You’d be surprised how few people actually can produce detailed fuel records. It’s hard to run a test when you can’t set a baseline.”
I can’t say whether Roman’s magnets belong on a fuel line any more than they do a refrigerator (call him yourself, if you want: 905/833-7529). But I think there’s a bell-clear ring of truth to the guy’s observations about the costs his prospects are willing to absorb and how they manage those costs.
At a time when folks are scrutinizing freight contracts, supplier agreements, and budgets, I thought his words were worth repeating.
Have your say
This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.